Hinweise zur Catholic Encyclopedia
Blaise Pascal
Born at Clermont-Ferrand, 19 June 1623; died in Paris, 19 August 1662. He was
the son of Etienne Pascal, advocate at the court of Aids of Clermont, and of
Antoinette Bégon. His father, a man of fortune, went with his children (1631) to
live in Paris. He taught his son grammar, Latin, Spanish, and mathematics, all
according to an original method. In his twelfth year Blaise composed a treatise
on the communication of sounds; at sixteen another treatise, on conic sections.
In 1639 he went to Rouen with his father, who had been appointed intendant of
Normandy, and, to assist his father in his calculations, he invented the
arithmetical machine. He repeated Torricelli's vacuum experiments and
demonstrated, against Père Noël, the weight of air (cf. Mathiew, Revue de
Paris
, 1906; Abel Lefranc Revue Bleue
, 1906; Strowski, Pascal
, Paris, 1908).
He published works on the arithmetical triangle, on wagers and the theory of
probabilities, and on the roulette or cycloid.
Meanwhile, in 1646, he had been won over to Jansenism, and induced his family,
especially his sister Jacqueline, to follow in the same direction. In 1650,
after a sojourn in Auvergne, his family returned to Paris. On the advice of
physicians Pascal, who had always been ailing and who now suffered more than
ever, relaxed his labours and mingled in society, with such friends as the Duc
de Roannez, the Chevalier Mere, the poet Desbarreaux, the actor Milton. This was
what has been called the worldly period of his life, during which he must have
written the Discours sur les passions de l'amour
, inspired, it is said, by
Mlle de Roannez. But the world soon became distasteful to him, and he felt more
and more impelled to abandon it. During the night of 23 November 1654, his
doubts were settled by a sort of vision, the evidence of which is in a writing,
always subsequently carried in the lining of his coat, and called Pascal's
talisman
. After this he practiced the most severe asceticism, renounced
learning, and became the constant quest of Port Royal. In 1656 he undertook the
defense of Jansenism, and published the Provinciales
. This polemical work was
nearing completion when Pascal had the joy of seeing his friends, the Duc de
Roannez and the jurisconsult Domat, converted to Jansenism, as well as his niece
Marguerite Perier, who had been cured of a fistula of the eye by contact with a
relic of the Holy Thorn preserved at Port Royal. Thenceforth, although exhausted
by illness, Pascal gave himself more and more to God. He multiplied his
mortifications, wore a cincture of nails which he drove into his flesh at the
slightest thought of vanity, and to be more like Jesus crucified, he left his
own house and went to die in that of his brother-in-law. He wrote the Mystère
de Jesus
, a sublime memorial of his transports of faith and love, and he
laboured to collect the materials for a great apologetic work. He died at the
age of thirty-nine, after having received in an ecstasy of joy the Holy Viaticum,
for which he had several times asked, crying out as he half rose from his couch:
May God never abandon me.
Pascal left numerous scientific works, among which must be mentioned Essai
sur les coniques
(1640); Avis à ceux qui verront la machine arithmétique
(1645); Récit de la grande expérience de l'équilibre des liqueurs
(1648);
Traité du triangle arithmétique
(1654). He shows himself a determined advocate
of the experimental method, in opposition to the mathematical and mechanical
method of Descartes. In his Traité sur la vide
, often reprinted with the
Pensées
under the title De l'autorité en matière de philosophie
, Pascal
clearly puts the question regarding progress, which he answers, boldly yet
prudently in L'esprit géometrique
, where he luminously distinguishes between
the geometrical and the acute mind, and establishes the foundations of the art
of persuasion. As to his authorship of the Discours sur les passions de
l'amour
, that essay at least contains certain theories familiar to the author
of the Pensées
on the part played by intuition in sentiment and aesthetic, and
its style for the most part resembles that of Pascal. The Entretien avec M. de
Saci sur Epictète et Montaigne
gives the key to the Pensées
; psychology
serving as the foundation and criterion of apologetics, various philosophies
solving the problem only in one aspect, and Christianity alone affording the
complete solution.
But Pascal's two masterpieces are the Provinciales
and the Pensées
. The
occasion of the Provinciales
was an accident. The Duc of Liancourt, a friend
of Port Royal, having been refused absolution by the curé of Saint Sulpice,
Antoine Arnauld wrote two letters which were censured by the Sorbonne. He wished
to appeal to the public in a pamphlet which he submitted to his friends, but
they found it too heavy and theological. He then said to Pascal: You, who are
young, must do something.
The next day (23 Jan., 1656) Pascal brought the first
Provinciale
. The Petites lettres
followed to the number of nineteen, the
last unfinished, from January, 1656, to March, 1657. Appearing under the
pseudonym of Louis de Montalte, they were published at Cologne in 1657 as Les
Provinciales, ou Lettres écrites par Louis de Montalte à un provincial de ses
amis et au RR. PP. Jesuites sur le sujet de la morale et de la politique de ces
pères
. The first four treat the dogmatic question which forms the basis of
Jansenism on the agreement between grace and human liberty. Pascal answers it by
practically, if not theoretically, denying sufficient grace and liberty. The
seventeenth and eighteenth letters take up the same questions, but with
noteworthy qualifications. From the fourth to the sixteenth Pascal censures the
Jesuit moral code, or rather the casuistry, first, by depicting a naîf Jesuit
who, through silly vanity, reveals to him the pretended secrets of the Jesuit
policy, and then by direct invective against the Jesuits themselves. The most
famous are the fourth, on sins of ignorance, and the thirteenth, on homicide.
That Pascal intended this to be a useful work, his whole life bears witness,
as do his deathbed declarations. His good faith cannot seriously be doubted, but
some of his methods are more questionable. Without ever seriously altering his
citations from the casuists, as he has sometimes been wrongfully accused of
doing, he arranges them somewhat disingenously; he simplifies complicated
questions excessively, and, in setting forth the solutions of the casuists
sometimes lets his own bias interfere. But the gravest reproach against him is,
first, that he unjustly blamed the Society of Jesus, attacking it exclusively,
and attributing to it a desire to lower the Christian ideal and to soften down
the moral code in the interest of its policy; then that he discredited casuistry
itself by refusing to recognize its legitimacy or, in certain cases, its
necessity, so that not only the Jesuits, but religion itself suffered by this
strife, which contributed to hasten the condemnation of certain lax theories by
the Church. And, without wishing or even knowing it, Pascal furnished weapons on
the one hand to unbelievers and adversaries of the Church and on the other to
the partisans of independent morality. As to their literary form, the
Provinciales
are, in point of time, the first prose masterpiece of the French
language, in their satirical humour and passionate eloquence.
The Pensées
are an unfinished work. From his conversion to Jansenism Pascal
nourished the project of writing an apology for the Christian Religion which the
increasing number of libertines rendered so necessary at that time. He had
elaborated the plan, and at intervals during his illness he jotted down notes,
fragments, and meditations for his book. In 1670 Port Royal issued an incomplete
edition. Condorcet, on the advice of Voltaire, attempted, in 1776, to connect
Pascal with the Philosophie party by means of a garbled edition, which was
opposed by that of the Abbe Bossuet (1779). After a famous report of Cousin on
the manuscript of the Pensées
(1842), Faugère published the first critical
edition (1844), followed since then by a host of others, the best of which is
undoubtedly that of Michaut (Basle, 1896), which reproduces the original MS.
pure and simple. What Pascal's plan was, can never be determined, despite the
information furnished by Port Royal and by his sister. It is certain that his
method of apologetics must have been at once rigorous and original; no doubt, he
had made use of the traditional proofs - notably, the historical argument from
prophecies and miracles. But as against adversaries who did not admit historical
certainty, it was stroke of genius to produce a wholly psychological argument
and, by starting from the study of the human soul, to arrive at God. Man is an
incomprehensible monster
, says he, at once sovereign greatness and sovereign
misery.
Neither dogmatism nor pyrrhonism will solve the enigma: the one
explains the greatness of man, the other his misery; but neither explains both.
We must listen to God. Christianity alone, through the doctrine of the Fall and
that of the Incarnation, gives the key to the mystery. Christianity, therefore,
is truth. God being thus apprehended and felt by the heart - which has its
reasons that the mind knows not of
, and which, amid the confusion of the other
faculties, is never mistaken - it remains for us to go to Him through the will,
by making acts of faith even before we have faith.
Another curious argument of Pascal's is that which is known as the argument of the wager. God exists or He does not exist, and we must of necessity lay odds for or against Him.
- If I wager for and God is - infinite gain;
- If I wager for and God is not - no loss.
- If I wager against and God is - infinite loss;
- If I wager against and God is not - neither loss nor gain.
In the second case there is an hypothesis wherein I am exposed to the loss of everything. Wisdom, therefore, counsels me to make the wager which insures my winning all or, at worst losing nothing. Innumerable works were devoted to Pascal in the second half of the nineteenth century. Poets, critics, roman-writers, theologians, philosophers have drawn their inspiration from him or made him the subject of discussion. As M. Bourget has said, he is not only one of the princes of style, but he represents the religious soul in its most tragic and terrified aspects. Moreover, the problems which he presents are precisely those which confront us nowadays.
SAINT-BEUVE, Port-Royal, I, II, III (Paris, 1880); VINET, Étude sur Blaise Pascal (Paris, 1848); SULLY-PRUDHOMME, La vraie religion selon Pascal (Paris, 1909); BRUNETIERE, Études critiques, ser. 1, 3, 4; Hist. et literature, II (Paris, 1880-1903); MICHAUT, Les époques de la pensée de Pascal (Paris, 1897); GIRAUD, Pascal; l'homme, l'oeuvre, l'influence (Paris, 1905); BOUTROUX in Coll.. des grands écrivains francais (Paris, 1900); STROWSKI, Pascal et son temps (Paris, 1909); (especially important); TAYLOR, Pascal's Thoughts on Religion and Philosophy (London, 1804); JANNESS, La philosophie et l'apologétique de P. (Louvain, 1896).
Heiligenlexikon als USB-Stick oder als DVD
Unterstützung für das Ökumenische Heiligenlexikon
Artikel kommentieren / Fehler melden
Suchen bei amazon: Bücher über Catholic Encyclopedia - Blaise Pascal
Wikipedia: Artikel über Catholic Encyclopedia - Blaise Pascal
Fragen? - unsere FAQs antworten!
Impressum - Datenschutzerklärung
korrekt zitieren: Artikel
Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet das Ökumenische Heiligenlexikon in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über https://d-nb.info/1175439177 und https://d-nb.info/969828497 abrufbar.